I chose to update the Wikipedia page for “online activism”. I have to admit that I was a little hesitant to contribute to Wikipedia. I know its open to contribution by its users by design, but I was worried that what I could add may not be seen as coming from credible enough of a source to be worth including. My practicum research consisted of my own observation, and not necessarily facts that I read from scholarly research. In short, I treaded somewhat lightly, adding information and elaborating on concepts where I could. I’ve included photos of the page before I edited it, along with “after” photos so you can see exactly what I wrote:
-First, under the “criticism” section of Internet activism, I elaborated on the concept of digital divides and how it relates to activism, particularly which groups may be left out of activism online (those w/ less access to technology, or lacking technology literacy).
-Second, I expanded upon the idea of “slacktivisim” which was mentioned briefly under the ‘criticism’ section. The idea was introduced without detail, so I expanded upon it by explaining how Internet activism in itself cannot lead to tangible change and that many people fail to be activists beyond their computer.
-Third, I added additional information not touched upon in the ‘criticism’ section by summarizing arguments for and against the belief that the Internet is good for activism.
It ended up being pretty cool to see things that I wrote on a major website like Wikipedia…who knows how long it will stay up, but satisfying none the less. I believe my contributions to the site provide useful and important insight into issues associated with online activism.
So I tracked my use of “computerized” devices last night, and I’ve concluded that I stay extremely wired/ connected most the time….no surprise there.
I was (unfortunately) at the library for several hours last night. As I was writing a paper, I had my laptop out. I was simultaneously researching for my paper, writing for my paper, and probably all too often checking Facebook, Twitter, email and my guilty pleasure, Perezhilton.com. My iPhone was also never far. I was using this mostly to text.
After I left the library, I continued to use the internet on my laptop to check my social networking sites, email, and to read lots of awesome stories about the awesome Badgers and the Rose Bowl! If my laptop is not out, I tended to still check these things every now and then up until I go to bed. I watched Netflix through the Wii, so thats hooked up to the internet.
Even as I laid down to bed, I was still “computerized”. I fell asleep to an episode of The League on my laptop. Staying connected through these devices is informative and generally entertaining. However, I wasted a ton of time at the library (as I often do) when I should have been strictly working on my paper. I will be paying dearly for that tonight. I also wish that at night, when I’m off the clock and ready to relax, it was easier to “unplug” and avoid things like email, but its such a habit to check these things regularly. I believe my use of computerized devices is probably pretty reflective of the usual college student, and probably a broader demographic.
If you all think far back, you may remember that during my presentation on social/ political advocacy I mentioned that I’d been lucky enough to score a phone interview with an employee at one of my organizations of interest, Rock the Vote. I was pretty excited to get the interview. My initial efforts to reach out to my organizations came up short and I didn’t receive feedback after attempts through email, Facebook and Twitter. However, Caitlin got back to me in what seemed like minutes of my sending an inquiry to gather more information for a school project. Given the relatively brief time of the in-class presentation, I was only able to tie in a couple of important points from the interview. I thought the blog post would be a great opportunity to share more, because I felt like the interview was really informative and interesting. Below I’ve attached the questions I asked during the interview. Caitlin’s responses are not precise or in complete sentences, but my aggressive typing during the interview, I believe, was sufficient accurately capture what she said in note-form.
- What is your job at Rock the Vote?
- Support marketing team, focus on supporting superiors on the marketing team, managing social media and rock the vote blog
- How does Rock the Vote use the internet to communicate its message?
- In a lot of different ways
- Online voter registration tool accessible through website
- Way to register most voters in organization
- 1.6 million voters in 2008
- print and mail to correct count board of elections
- can install to other websites
- fully functioning website w/ volunteer hub to sign up to volunteer, join events, create own events
- list concerts, ticket giveaways, asking for volunteers registering voters at the concert
- merchandise store online
- social media
- twitter: election reminders: local election days, voter registration deadlines, breaking news, updates, ticket giveaways
- same type of updates on Facebook
- blog: in-house or out-house writers, write about issues pertinent to young people
- ex. college grad wrote on Obama’s plans for student debt
- out of the box, opinions
- press clips
- interns compile important daily news clips
- news in technology, entertainment, breaking
- google list serve and on blog
- What are the most beneficial aspects of the internet for your organization? Do you see any cons?
- Online voter registration tool is most beneficial
- Easy, big #s
- Young people are so into the internet, make process simple, do it in a way that they know
- Ease of process
- No downsides to rock the vote’s use of internet
- Press enter, actually process registration online
- What they are encouraging
- Encouraging modernization of voter registration
- Rock the Vote was founded in 1990, prior to the surge of the Internet. How has Rock the Vote adapted to changes in technology over the years, particularly the rise of social media sites like Facebook and Twitter?
- Signed on and used Facebook and Twitter to their advantage
- Used to make a lot more cold calls, more utilization of phone-athons and going door to door
- Reaching more people
- Now emails
- There are concerns that the internet makes activism more passive. For example, someone might “like” a group on Facebook but fail to take action beyond that. Do you think this is valid? How does Rock the Vote avoid passive involvement?
- People who participate in the Internet are probably people who wouldn’t have involved in the first place.
- This is their way to do it
- People that would actually do it: internet or not because they have the motivation, reasons, passionate people
- How do you think that your demographic of young people effects the way that your organization uses the internet, or the overall importance of using the internet to connect with members?
- Great tool
- Voter registration tool
- Modernize to fit them and what they are used to
- Doing things online
Well, I watch videos pretty regularly on both YouTube and Hulu, so the first thing that came to mind when I knew we would be comparing the video watching experience between the two, was the difference in…How do I say it? Professionalism, Commercialism, Uniformity? Essentially, Hulu is highly regulated in the content that it appears, in how they let you watch videos, how advertisments are experienced. The video quality is excellent. Youtube is a lot more variable in terms of all these things; particiuarly how and if the content is regulated, and the extent to which Youtube controls what is posted and what isn’t.
I watched an episode of Modern Family on Hulu and a video of Florence + The Machine performing “Shake it Out” on X-Factor UK on YouTube. My expectations were met. When I began my episode of Modern Family I was given the option to watch one long extended-form commercial and then watch the episode straight through without interruption, or to proceed with regular “commercial breaks”. I obviously selected the former, muted my hulu for 3 minutes and un-paused my itunes. Had I chosen the latter option, watching Modern Family would have been very much like watching it on a TV, with commercial breaks from big name sponsors. As an interesting note, Hulu also has a bar at the top of the screen asking if the ad is relevant to you. A great example of how the internet hones in on our interests to market more specifically to us. On YouTube, I actually experienced zero advertising before, after, at the bottom of the screen…while watching the performance. I watched my video in peace. After the video, and along the sides, I was simply provided with links to similar videos.
The different video viewing experiences between the two sites I think captures that they are run quite differently; by a large network with lots of regulations, versus more user-based.
I must be honest when I say that copyright doesn’t cross my mind all that often when I’m online. It’s probably a combination of the fact that 1. I don’t do that many things online that are in violation of copyright (I don’t think…), 2. I’m probably not well-informed enough about copyright rules online, or 3. I’m not worried about the consequences of my behaviors that violate copyright. Whether that’s the smartest thing is a different matter.
I’m not a huge producer of online content so I don’t have to worry too much about violating copyright or other regulations in this realm. If I quote or reference an article, song etc. online I always include the link or “cite” the source, and not claim the content as my own. Where I should be paying attention to copyrights or regulation is when I’m acting as a consumer of online content. Things that I consume online that are likely in violation of some rules would be when I download music or watch TV shows online. I used to download music a lot more than I do now, with little regard for copyright or the artists. Now I make an effort to actually purchase the music of artists I respect and admire because I don’t want to steal there work. Even if they are probably loaded, its there product and they, and others that worked on it, deserve to be compensated. Unfortunately my college student budget can’t keep up with my desire for new music. Admittedly, I use Vuze, which is great (probably not according to copyright regulations…) because it allows you to download entire albums and discographies with one click, verses song by song (like on Limewire). I don’t worry too much about getting in trouble for my music downloading habits because in reality, there aren’t the resources to go after every person that illegally downloads music. If enforcement is going to follow-up with a downloader I assume it would be someone who downloads much more music than me because I know they are out there.
I also use the internet to watch TV shows that I’ve missed or go on marathons of multiple past seasons. I know this isn’t strictly legal also. When I do think about regulations most is when I try endless links and they’ve all been removed due to “copyright infringement” and my favorite sites (RIP surfthechannel) get discovered and basically become useless because of all the broken links. It seems to me as a user that the owners of this material are doing a decent job locating infringements and taking it down. I’m sure after learning more in lecture about copyright I will be more conscience about it online. Whether I’ll actually change my behavior is another thing.
So, as you may know by now we are googling ourselves this week. And that’s what I did…
I am pleased to say not too much about me is out there, or at least surfacing on Google…The first thing that came up for me was two identical links to my Twitter account, just in case you didn’t see the first one or something. This is okay with me. I’m pretty careful not to say or post anything I wouldn’t want employers and what not seeing- I’m not perfect and swear words may work their way into my tweets occasionally. Next you find a link to my Facebook page, where you can see my profile picture and interests, but not my networks.Next were links to mylife.com, under my name. Someone named Katherine Thibeau, married to an Edward Thibeau comes up on ancestry.com.Don’t believe there is any relation. A few of my profile pictures came up under Google images.
The most interesting thing I found was a couple stories on my Aunt Mary Katherine, who passed away in 2004, and now has a scholarship in her name. It was always nice to remember her. I did find an electronic copy of her Minnesota Education license, with the dates of application and renewal. I was surprised that this was out there, just one click away.
Overall, googling my myself was entertaining, but not surprising. I’m glad my identity is relatively private through a Google search. I think privacy online is important and I wouldn’t want anything like my address or phone number popping up to threaten my safety.
Hey everyone! So tomorrow is the big day…my practicum presentation. I will be discussing the ways that organizations use the Internet to promote activism, as well as the possible pros and cons of activism online. This ties into the recent conversations in lecture and in discussion regarding whether the Internet improves democracy, or leads to more inequality (think the digital divide) and political disengagment (think “slacktivism”). So I’m wondering…
Certain pros and cons can be identified regarding activist activity online. Overall, do you think that that the Internet brings more positive change to activism, by offering new forms for sharing information, communicating etc. or does the Internet do more harm than good by discouraging more active forms of political/ social involvement and excluding groups with limited access online from being engaged?
I hope this gives you something to think about! See you all tomorrow.